Building Revelation Infrastructure
Professionalizing the Urantia movement for global outreach—without imposing an orthodoxy
Rodan, a fervent follower of Jesus, was both an evangelist and a professional philosopher. According to Rodan, the true religionist cultivates a meditative and discerning interior life (160:1.10) and pursues the art of wise and mature living (160:2). But Rodan went wider than that. He also taught that genuine religion is both robustly communal and dynamic in its outreach. In fact, it fosters a union of souls (ha!). Such a union of faith practitioners is able “mobilize group wisdom” and “pool spiritual possessions” (160:2.2). At 160:5.3 he argues lucidly that real religion—if it is not “self-deceived”—raises up inspired individuals who are evangelistic. In other words, and to put it in humorous terms, we Urantians should do much more than foster study groups dominated by left-brained males.
Once upon a time, before paved roads and combustion engines, two of Rodan’s unnamed pupils travelled from Alexandria to Jerusalem, where they “made many converts among the Hellenists.” They catalyzed Stephen, a brilliant young follower of Jesus, to publicly preach “more as Jesus taught”—whereupon, one tragic day, Stephen became the first Christian martyr (see Acts 7 in the Bible). This cathartic event activated Jerusalem to become an outreach hub to the Roman empire. Church history arguably begins from this moment. (See 190:4 for details.)
Here’s a bold question: Is your study group capable of following Rodan to inspire youth to become modern-day apostles for the gospel movement? In this post, I’ll broach how to mobilize existing material resources to take the next step in church history—while leaving behind “churchiness” (as well as fanaticism and martyrdom).
Rodan was a consummate professional in his day, and I argue that we urgently need such competent professionals in our time. So let’s get practical and identify financial resources already available to support this approach, worldwide.
Toward a movement for Urantia Book heterodoxy
Today’s postmodern milieu is a wild confluence of cultures and religious ideas that will never countenance a Urantia-based orthodoxy.
Young people have far more attractive options at their fingertips, and their approach to spirituality is amplified by the AI engines in their palms.
As I have stated in an earlier post (“The Big Crunch”), the well-meaning attempt by boomer Fellowship administrators to create a worship ceremony at the recent Summer Session, replete with grape juice and crunchy wafers and old Christian hymns, was an honest but wrong-headed way to fill the vacuum of real religion in our movement—albeit carried out with good will (and a rather rockin’ band).
Nor should it be in the purview of our major organizations to define in-groups and out-groups. Very oddly, they exclude those who experiment with celestial contact, even though our very movement began with decades of telepathic celestial contact. Suppressing present-day contactees, or for that matter prophets and unorthodox preachers, is a prima facie attempt to impose an orthodoxy.
I advocate that our leading organizations should instead go wide and favor religious freedom. They should not try to fill the worship vacuum they have unwittingly created. They should not exclude exotic practices they have not studied. What they should do is become cheerleaders, catalyzers, funders, trainers, planners, and competent professional administrators whose work is to foster genuine religion out in the field, especially by evangelical youth.
Toward that end, they should create an infrastructure that supports the growth of a wide range of independent ministries, missions, and service experiments, and refrain from competing with them or designing an orthodoxy to regulate them.
Let’s find ways to foster—with material resources—experimental communities and pods of creative evangelists, each with unique expressions and their own home-grown rites, worship practices, and modes of outreach and sermonizing. Let them find each other and pool spiritual possessions as they see fit. This is the most effective way to raise postmodern apostles energized for worldwide outreach in a dangerous and chaotic world.
Bring on the professionals
A key missing piece here is professionalism, a topic I promised to cover in my last post, wherein I also lamented how the Urantia movement is insular and stuck in gridlock, in part because it lacks independent journalistic scrutiny and public accountability.
In other words, if we put on a journalistic hat and look at the raw data, we will quickly realize that we simply need more paid staff, mundane as that sounds. We need people well-trained and highly experienced in the business disciplines and the business methods required to foster a sustainable worldwide outreach movement. And that requires substantial funding—indeed, funds that appear to already be available.
Friends, face it. We are a movement run almost entirely by volunteers and each one is a well-meaning amateur. Most have no professional training for their self-appointed roles in the movement, let alone business-world experience, and many are unaware of church history and the journey of Christian missionaries, for better or worse, over two millennia. The effectiveness of these sincere workers for the revelation is born out by the fact that our movement is increasingly becoming irrelevant, even as the world passes us by.
Sorry to put it so starkly—so please, someone, prove me wrong.
An independent thinker and writer, Ryan McGuire, recently pointed out in an email to movement leaders that “Urantia Foundation and The Urantia Book Fellowship devote only a small portion of their actual expenditures to mission‑aligned outreach.” McGuire brought forward some striking numbers, figures available in a required annual public filing: IRS Form 990. His report is lengthy, but for now we’ll examine its data very briefly, enough to grasp our movement’s out-of-proportion financial ratios.
Did you know that the Urantia Foundation’s (UF) total net assets in 2024 were over $20 million? (See ProPublica). Meanwhile, annual revenue has more than doubled since 2011 to over $2 million, and the UF’s net revenues have been roughly double their expenses in recent years.
Of that, how much do you think went to paid full-time staffers, that is, competent professionals able to manage the spread of the Fifth Epochal Revelation to our troubled world?
Or, put it this way: How many professionals do we have on hand with the profile of a Rodan, a man capable of training the young evangelists who turned Jerusalem upside down?
The UF has only one full-time staffer, the very capable Tamara Strumfeld. All told, wage and salary expenses were about $200,000 in 2024. (See Annual Report.) Friends, do the math and consider these ratios: $20m in net assets, $2m in revenues annually, and $200k annually devoted to salaries and wages.
The Urantia Book Fellowship displays a similar ratio, with just one full-time staffer, the highly skilled and dynamic Geoff Theiss, plus assets of over $3 million and revenues that greatly exceed expenses. (See Cause IQ.)
Enough said for now. I will leave it there, a thread we will pick up again soon.



Frankly, Byron, it is positively painful to see enthusiastic and talented believers stuck on the sidelines because they can't afford to do more for the advancement of the revelation. Do any in leadershipe roles give any thought to the fact that the early gospel teachers were enabled to focus exclusively on outreach and propaganda work as a result of the financial support from the wider community? This is referenced repeatedly in the teachings, even by Jesus. Yet not one writer, preacher, content creator or teacher is supported. Surely, when the brethren are donating to these organisations they are hoping and praying that at least some of those funds will go to support talented gospel teachers who will be able to bring the revelation to the next level. Of course, I completely understand the reticience of the stewards of the funds of the faithful - and how they must be conservative with the resources that have been entrusted to their keeping. No one wants to be guilty of funding a con-man, and wherever there is money then scammers wouldn't be far behind. But I feel there is grave spiritual danger in being TOO CAREFUL - much like the slotful severant who buried the talent. They leadership appear so afraid to spend it they are rendering the funds worse than useless. There will be an accounting one fateful day, and they will be asked: what did you do with the resources we gave you? What did you invest in? What did you take chances on?...Anyway, this is an important topic - and even I have written on it but haven't published. Thanks for getting the ball rolling Byron. Keep up the good work. ;-)
Thank you for following up with this hard-hitting and genuinely thought-provoking piece. It takes uncommon clarity—and courage—to name problems that many privately recognize but few are willing to state publicly. Your persistence and refusal to accept managed decline are precisely what this movement needs.
To the point, we need someone like you—perhaps you yourself—in the president’s seat. You exhibit what has been missing for far too long: a will to lead, a tolerance for discomfort, and a refusal to confuse preservation with progress. Those qualities are widely respected across the Urantia community, even if many feel constrained from saying so openly.
The “McGuire fellow” you reference sounds like a sharp operator indeed (lol) and the numbers do not lie. When a movement with tens of millions in assets devotes a token fraction of its resources to actual mission-aligned outreach, something is profoundly misaligned. This is not a matter of intent; it is a matter of will and execution.
Let’s be blunt:
It would not be difficult to make Urantia a household word.
But effective evangelism, media strategy, youth engagement, and professional administration cost real money. What we have instead is institutional parsimony masquerading as prudence. The Foundation is not poor. It is chintzy—and in an era of AI-driven culture formation, global spiritual hunger, and collapsing meaning systems, that is inexcusable.
History is unambiguous on this point. Christianity did not spread because it was cautious. Islam did not expand because it was bureaucratically restrained. Buddhism did not endure because it hoarded capital. Living religions invest aggressively in people, message, and momentum.
So let me state this clearly for donors and truth-seekers alike:
Do not give a dime to The Foundation, which stockpiles resources while the revelation stagnates.
If you want your support to matter, fund the people who are actually doing the work:
Byron Belitsos
Jerrold Burden
April Johnson
Charles Lehner
These are individuals producing content, shaping minds, and engaging the world with minimal resources and maximal resolve. They are creating momentum where The Foundation offers only inertia—protecting its wealth, defending its position, and withholding meaningful financial backing from those willing to take risks and labor in the trenches. This is a case study in dereliction of duty. Capital is hoarded, initiative is starved, and the mission is left to survive on scraps.
If you belong to a study group, look around. Identify the person with fire, vision, and stamina—the one organizing events, writing, teaching, reaching outward. Fund that person directly. Then you will know, with certainty, that your resources are advancing the revelation rather than disappearing into the coffers of The Foundation's institutional passivity.
Challenging the Foundation is not disloyalty to the Urantia movement or to The Urantia Book itself. It is necessary.
The Urantia Foundation exists to serve the movement—not to outlive it. When the Foundation's leadership loses its evangelistic nerve, and it has, it forfeits moral authority. What we are witnessing is not stewardship; it is abdication.
To anyone reading this: if you are searching for ways to make a difference, understand this—you already are. Your questions, your dissatisfaction, your insistence on results are signs of spiritual vitality. Do not let that vitality be neutralized by structures within The Urantia Foundation that mistake caution for wisdom.
The future of our movement will not be decided by The Foundation's weak leadership.
It will be decided by those willing to act, fund boldly, and speak plainly.
History always belongs to them.