Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Strange Preacher's avatar

Frankly, Byron, it is positively painful to see enthusiastic and talented believers stuck on the sidelines because they can't afford to do more for the advancement of the revelation. Do any in leadershipe roles give any thought to the fact that the early gospel teachers were enabled to focus exclusively on outreach and propaganda work as a result of the financial support from the wider community? This is referenced repeatedly in the teachings, even by Jesus. Yet not one writer, preacher, content creator or teacher is supported. Surely, when the brethren are donating to these organisations they are hoping and praying that at least some of those funds will go to support talented gospel teachers who will be able to bring the revelation to the next level. Of course, I completely understand the reticience of the stewards of the funds of the faithful - and how they must be conservative with the resources that have been entrusted to their keeping. No one wants to be guilty of funding a con-man, and wherever there is money then scammers wouldn't be far behind. But I feel there is grave spiritual danger in being TOO CAREFUL - much like the slotful severant who buried the talent. They leadership appear so afraid to spend it they are rendering the funds worse than useless. There will be an accounting one fateful day, and they will be asked: what did you do with the resources we gave you? What did you invest in? What did you take chances on?...Anyway, this is an important topic - and even I have written on it but haven't published. Thanks for getting the ball rolling Byron. Keep up the good work. ;-)

Ryan Keith McGuire's avatar

Thank you for following up with this hard-hitting and genuinely thought-provoking piece. It takes uncommon clarity—and courage—to name problems that many privately recognize but few are willing to state publicly. Your persistence and refusal to accept managed decline are precisely what this movement needs.

To the point, we need someone like you—perhaps you yourself—in the president’s seat. You exhibit what has been missing for far too long: a will to lead, a tolerance for discomfort, and a refusal to confuse preservation with progress. Those qualities are widely respected across the Urantia community, even if many feel constrained from saying so openly.

The “McGuire fellow” you reference sounds like a sharp operator indeed (lol) and the numbers do not lie. When a movement with tens of millions in assets devotes a token fraction of its resources to actual mission-aligned outreach, something is profoundly misaligned. This is not a matter of intent; it is a matter of will and execution.

Let’s be blunt:

It would not be difficult to make Urantia a household word.

But effective evangelism, media strategy, youth engagement, and professional administration cost real money. What we have instead is institutional parsimony masquerading as prudence. The Foundation is not poor. It is chintzy—and in an era of AI-driven culture formation, global spiritual hunger, and collapsing meaning systems, that is inexcusable.

History is unambiguous on this point. Christianity did not spread because it was cautious. Islam did not expand because it was bureaucratically restrained. Buddhism did not endure because it hoarded capital. Living religions invest aggressively in people, message, and momentum.

So let me state this clearly for donors and truth-seekers alike:

Do not give a dime to The Foundation, which stockpiles resources while the revelation stagnates.

If you want your support to matter, fund the people who are actually doing the work:

Byron Belitsos

Jerrold Burden

April Johnson

Charles Lehner

These are individuals producing content, shaping minds, and engaging the world with minimal resources and maximal resolve. They are creating momentum where The Foundation offers only inertia—protecting its wealth, defending its position, and withholding meaningful financial backing from those willing to take risks and labor in the trenches. This is a case study in dereliction of duty. Capital is hoarded, initiative is starved, and the mission is left to survive on scraps.

If you belong to a study group, look around. Identify the person with fire, vision, and stamina—the one organizing events, writing, teaching, reaching outward. Fund that person directly. Then you will know, with certainty, that your resources are advancing the revelation rather than disappearing into the coffers of The Foundation's institutional passivity.

Challenging the Foundation is not disloyalty to the Urantia movement or to The Urantia Book itself. It is necessary.

The Urantia Foundation exists to serve the movement—not to outlive it. When the Foundation's leadership loses its evangelistic nerve, and it has, it forfeits moral authority. What we are witnessing is not stewardship; it is abdication.

To anyone reading this: if you are searching for ways to make a difference, understand this—you already are. Your questions, your dissatisfaction, your insistence on results are signs of spiritual vitality. Do not let that vitality be neutralized by structures within The Urantia Foundation that mistake caution for wisdom.

The future of our movement will not be decided by The Foundation's weak leadership.

It will be decided by those willing to act, fund boldly, and speak plainly.

History always belongs to them.

9 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?